|
New urbanism pushes transit systems ahead
of cars
Tuesday, August 17, 2004 - John Driscoll
The Congress for the New Urbanism is focused
on creating an urban environment that is not driven by the automobile,
according to David Hudson, congress executive vice-president.
That environment would put a halt to urban sprawl
and include communities designed for the pedestrian with narrower
streets, green roofs, protection of the natural environment and
efficient transit systems, Hudson says.
The benefits include a safer, less polluted
environment and more liveable neighbourhoods in both larger and
smaller cities, he says. “The automobile too often takes
precedence in urban planning and government spending.”
The Chicago-based congress has 2,500 members
and has developed a charter of the new urbanism dedicated to reclaiming
the urban environment in neighbourhoods, towns and cities, Hudson
explains in a telephone interview with Axiom News.
“I think it’s an idea that
is catching on,” he says.
A red flag went up for the public with the current
congestion on highways, stemming from dependence on the automobile
for transportation Hudson says. “People realize urban sprawl
can’t continue the way it has been going.”
This concern has been sparked by recent sharp
increases in the price of gasoline, with people now more ready
to look at transit alternatives he says. “We should be able
to walk, take a train or ride a bicycle.”
People from the United States who visit Europe
where transit systems are efficient and well used always comment
fondly that they didn’t have to drive anywhere, he says.
“They love the pedestrian environments in European cities,
yet come home to the sprawl-ridden cities of North America and
drive their cars everywhere.”
The problem is an imbalance in money spent on
roads compared to money spent on other forms of transportation,
he says. In the United States, 80 per cent of federal transportation
funding is spent on roads with 20 per cent on transit, Hudson
says. “We would like more balanced funding.”
People complain about subsidies for transit
but not about subsidies for road infrastructure, he says. “The
federal government in the United States didn’t even fund
transit until 1991.”
The congress believes in density in the urban
core and that the urban core is sustainable by definition, Hudson
says. The key to transit is density, to attract riders, he says.
Suburbs popped up in North America beginning
in the 1950s but getting a house in the suburbs has never really
been the American dream, Hudson says. “It is the developers’
dream and it was skilfully marketed into the 1980s.”
Urban sprawl and pollution are the result,
he says. The new urbanism is focused on revitalizing towns and
cities, protecting agricultural lands and ending environmental
deterioration, according to the congress’ Charter of the
New Urbanism.
|