| |
|
 |
|
NDP
and Greens would blossom under proportional representation
Friday, July 2, 2004 - John Driscoll
The Green Party and the NDP, the two parties calling most strongly
for a form of proportional representation in federal elections,
would have benefited most if proportional representation had been
part of Monday's election.
On a national level, the NDP won 15.7 per cent
of the vote but captured only 6.2 per cent (19) of the seats.
The Greens got 4.3 per cent of the vote but zero seats.
The Liberals with 36.7 per cent of the vote
got 43.8 per cent (135) of the seats while the Conservatives,
with 29.6 per cent of the popular vote got 32.1 per cent (99)
of the seats.
The Bloc Quebecois, with 12.4 peer cent of the
total vote, concentrated in Quebec, wound up with 17.5 per cent
(54) of the seats.
If proportional representation had been in effect,
the result would have seen four parties with respectable results.
The Liberals would have wound up with 113 seats, the Conservatives
with 92, the NDP with 48, the BQ with 38 and the Greens with 13.
There would have four seats for independents and other parties.
While forms of proportional representation vary
around the world, the idea is to match as closely as possible,
the percentage of votes cast for a party with the percentage of
seats a party would assume after an election.
Proportional representation was not mentioned
in Liberal and Conservative platforms but it was a major plank
in both Green and NDP campaigns.
The Greens touted proportional representation
as ensuring that voter participation would increase and that more
women and more candidates from visible minorities would be elected.
The NDP platform called for a national referendum
on proportional representation and leader Jack Layton said after
the election he would pursue that objective as a key player in
a Liberal minority government.
Fair Vote Canada is a leading proponent of a
change in the elections system to proportional representation,
executive director Larry Gordon describing the current system
as "dubious democracy".
Gordon argues that under the current "first-past-the-post"
voting system, millions of votes are "wasted" in national
elections. "Make every vote count and the voter participation
rate will increase."
|
 |
 |

|
Peaceful Communities
is reaching more people!
The Grassroots Review
Peaceful Communities stories are now also posted on a collaborative
community news program focussing on Sustainable Choices, Healthy
Ecology and Civil Society. Click
here to check it out! |